The Lockerbie Case: Lockerbie Case in Holyrood II...

Friday, 1 July 2011

Lockerbie Case in Holyrood II...

This is the heading over an item published today on the influential (and amusing and learned) Lallands Peat Worrier blog. I hope that the blogger will revert to the topic once the Official Report of the Public Petitions Committee's deliberations becomes available on 4 July.

For the next six days I shall be on a trip to Graaff-Reinet, Port Elizabeth and Uniondale, on a quest for relief from the current Antarctic temperatures of Middelpos. Although I shall have my trusty laptop and dongle with me, it is unlikely that I shall be able to make many posts to this blog.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.