Monday, 13 November 2017

The long road ahead

[This is the headline over an article published in today’s edition of the Maltese newspaper The Times.  I find it sad that such uncritical acceptance of the official version of the Lockerbie tragedy can still be found, especially in Malta and in the columns of The Times. That newspaper and its sister publication The Sunday Times have been in the forefront of exposing the flaws in the investigation and prosecution that culminated in the conviction of Abdelbaset Megrahi.]

The tragic death by assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia will require detailed and widespread enquiry to find the perpetrators, as commentators in this newspaper have already pointed out.

I would like to stress the importance of minute forensic examination, cooperation with the best technical support for significant findings, and close liaison with the police and security forces of any country to which a connectionis demonstrated. Any witness or informant of this case must also be very carefully investigated.

All this clearly requires constant stamina, resources, and patience in sustaining the hunt.

I would like to give an authentic example of how critical the thoroughness, scale of the enquiry, and international help, all are in obtaining success.

On December 21, 1988, Pan Am flight 103 was destroyed over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing everybody on board and 11 people on the ground. One of the largest and most detailed forensic investigations in the world began.

The Scottish police force is not large, nor is that of Malta (which has the third smallest security and public order budget in the EU), and they quickly needed help from the FBI and English security forces.

A tiny piece of metal with a serial number on it traced the timer to its provider in Switzerland. The buyer had signed the receipt.

The radio had been wrapped in a series of clothing garments in the suitcase. Pieces of some of these still had legible labels and were traced to a Maltese brand. Scottish police came to Malta, talked with security personnel here and found the manufacturer and a retailer in Sliema, where the clothes were sold.

On questioning the shopkeeper, he remembered the sale to one customer of a number of garments, portions of all of which had been found in the wreckage. An umbrella had also been sold and pieces of an identical type were also found.

The date of the purchase was known, and the shopkeeper could recognise the purchaser, whom he had seen locally a number of times.

This accumulation of evidence, and the presence of the accused in Malta at the time (with a false passport from Libya) led to his arrest, trial and conviction at an internationally organised court in the Netherlands, but not until January 31, 2001.

It was established that the suitcase bomb had travelled from Malta to Frankfurt, Frankfurt to London, and so onto the Pan Am flight to New York as “unaccompanied luggage”.

All this shows the tremendous difficulties (plus diplomatic ones) which exist in finding a criminal in an international situation. We must also note that none of any supposed accomplices have yet been found.

But if such difficulties were overcome on that occasion, I think we may hope that the murderers of Daphne will be implacably hunted down. Neither time nor place hiding them from human justice.

4 comments:

  1. Apart from being just sad, it's also wrong. The PCB wasn't metal. There wasn't a serial number on it. Gauci never recognised Megrahi as someone he had seen around on Malta.

    It's just a shame that journalists are able to have such a torrent of fact-free inaccuracy printed in a newspaper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was IT for a couple of newspapers in Bangkok. 4-5 articles a day was the requirement for a fixed-employed journalist.
    Come, research fast, write fast, go home. Avoid anything that might land the newspaper in hot water. I know exactly what conclusion we'd had seen regarding Lockerbie guilt, had the subject come up.

    But this guy is not a professional writer. He is in the business of teaching us something:

    "I would like to stress the importance of minute forensic examination, cooperation with the best technical support for significant findings, and close liaison with the police and security forces of any country to which a connectionis demonstrated. Any witness or informant of this case must also be very carefully investigated."

    Yes, Sir, that sounds convincing indeed.

    Unfortunately maybe the most important thing was missing: "Every man with a theory takes his time to investigate each detail in his argumentation to the fullest, as 5 uncertain statements do not add up to one we can trust. The devil is in the detail."

    But that might be asking to much, when even high-ranking Scottish judges don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Note that de Braeckeleer added a comment to the article

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not the most coherent comment, but points for trying. I didn't think it was worth the effort at all.

    ReplyDelete