The Lockerbie Case: Lockerbie revisited

Sunday, 3 March 2013

Lockerbie revisited

A cartoon with this heading is published today on the website of Gulf News. It can be viewed here.

Lockerbie Revisited is also, of course, the title of Gideon Levy's documentary which won the 2009 Prix Europa for best television current affairs programme. It has still not been shown on a United Kingdom TV channel, but can be viewed here. (Thanks to Edwin Bollier for the link.)

3 comments:

ebol03 March, 2013
MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2013:

The informatieve documentary film "Lockerbie revisited" by Regisseur Gideon Levy on the website from Tegenlicht on VPRO, Nederland 2, is again blocked...

Please go over the alternate link-- via New York festivals:

http://www.newyorkfestivals.com/winners/tvf2011winners/pieces.php?iid=412747&pid=1

Pleas see also the interview from ex FBI Agent Mr. Fred Whitehurst:

http://vimeo.com/41131094

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO LTD, Switzerland. URL: www.lockerbie.ch

ReplyDelete
Replies
Grendal03 March, 2013
First time I've seen this and first time I've seen the clip of Gadaffi saying that, effectively, American oil companies paid the compensation. Was that part of the deal as the Libyans understood it?
It's great to watch Fraser doing the bemused innocent over the release of Khreesat. Wonder what he thought when Musa Kusa slipped through the UK's fingers!
ReplyDelete
Replies
Rolfe03 March, 2013
Well, thank you Edwin. That is a full English version of the film, rather than the half-English half-Dutch version that was all that was available previously.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.