Monday 4 March 2013

Abdelbaset Megrahi, Keith O'Brien and Kenneth Roy

[What follows is an excerpt from a special article published today on the Scottish Review website by the magazine’s editor, Kenneth Roy, under the headline The media assassination of Cardinal O'Brien:]

[T]here are many sound historical precedents for being instinctively suspicious of the sort of unholy consensus we have in the Scottish media today. I've never much liked the consensus: it so often tells a half-truth. So I intend to say a kind ungrudging word about Cardinal O'Brien, a man I've never met.

He and I shared a common interest in the case of Megrahi, who was convicted – probably wrongly – of the murder of 270 people at Lockerbie. We both signed a petition to the Scottish Parliament calling for the conviction to be re-visited and for a public inquiry to be instigated into the scandalous state of the evidence against Megrahi. It was not one of the more popular petitions ever submitted to the parliament. I seem to remember that it was signed by about 1,200 people, very few of whom were public figures. [RB: When the petition closed, having been offline for some considerable time, the number of signatures was 1646 -- one of the highest numbers achieved by any Scottish Parliament ePetition.]

Many who privately harboured doubts about the safety of the conviction preferred, in the Scottish manner, to keep their heads under the parapet. Keith O'Brien stuck his above it. I admired him for it. I thought it was the action of a brave and principled person. That does not make him any less of a hypocrite in his sexual conduct. But then we are all such a mass of contradictions. Only the journalists are squeaky clean. What's new?

8 comments:

  1. Mr Roy is clearly as innumerate as he is illiterate.

    Robert Forrester (JFM).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your actual words, if I recall correctly.... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are quite the very last person whose recall I would fault.

    Pip, pip.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are you both commenting on a different article?

    ReplyDelete
  5. No. Why would you think that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Same article, definitely. Call it reflections on recidivism. Maybe it's the tight weave of the repartee that's throwing you.

    ReplyDelete