The Lockerbie Case: Answer to PQ about extradition of Megrahi to USA

Wednesday 23 November 2011

Answer to PQ about extradition of Megrahi to USA

[On 11 November 2011 Christine Grahame MSP tabled a written question. Here is the question and the answer:]

Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (Scottish National Party): To ask the Scottish Executive whether the (a) Cabinet Secretary for Justice or (b) Lord Advocate had received any communication from the (i) US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, (ii) Home Office or (iii) interim Libyan government concerning proposals to extradite Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi to the USA. (S4W-04021)

Mr Kenny MacAskill: The Scottish Government have not received any communication from the United States Government, the Libyan National Transitional Council or the Home Office, concerning proposals to extradite Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi to the USA.

[If Mr Megrahi were to be extradited to the United States, this would place him (without any voluntary action on his part) in breach of the terms of the licence under which he was released from his Scottish life sentence. I understand that in the new Libyan cabinet announced yesterday Mohammed al-Alagi remains justice minister. He has in the past said that there was no question of any such extradition.]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.