This week

I understand that Edwin Bollier (principal of MeBo, the Zürich company that manufactured MST-13 timers, one of which allegedly detonated the bomb that destroyed Pan Am 103) will be visiting Edinburgh for a few days later this week. In 1988 MeBo employed as an engineer Ulrich Lumpert, who has recently sworn an affidavit to the effect that evidence that he gave at the Lockerbie trial about MST-13 circuit boards was false. It may be, though this is speculation on my part, that Bollier will be talking to Crown Office officials about Lumpert's new revelations.

At the procedural hearing on 11 October, the Crown was given six weeks to lodge written answers to the defence's petition for disclosure by the Crown of a document emanating from a foreign government (not the USA) relating to timers, the non-disclosure of which to the defence was included by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission among the six grounds upon which Megrahi's conviction might have constituted a miscarriage of justice. That six week period expires on Thursday, 22 November. If the document has not already been handed over to the defence (which the Crown indicated would happen if the foreign country agreed to its release) the Crown's written answers will require to be lodged on or before that date. Thereafter, a further procedural hearing will need to be fixed for the Court to hear the submissions of the parties and decide whether to order the Crown to hand the document over.

The Clinton-Bush air disaster cover-up plan

This is a link to an interesting article on WorldNetDaily by Jack Cashill. In it he contends that both President Bush the Elder and President Clinton covered up the truth about the shooting down by the USS Vincennes of Iranian Airbus flight IR 655 on 3 July 1988, killing all 290 on board. He explores the political motivation for the cover up and its virtually complete success. When Pan Am 103 was destroyed six months later, many believed (and continue to believe) that this was Iran's revenge. Cashill opines "The White House took care of Lockerbie just as smoothly. Wary of engaging either Iran or Iraq despite continued provocations from both, the Clinton White House put the squeeze on the defenseless Libya."
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58693

An anniversary

Sixteen years ago today, in simultaneous announcements in Edinburgh and Washington DC, the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC (http://www.lordfraser.com/) and the Acting Attorney General of the United States, William Barr (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr_(American_Attorney_General) disclosed that criminal proceedings had been launched against two Libyans, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi and al-Amin Khalifa Fhima, for the murder of the 270 people killed in the destruction of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie on 21 December 1988.

Robbie the Pict and Hans Koechler

Here is (1) the text of an e-mail sent to Robbie the Pict by Dr Hans Koechler, the UN-appointed observer at the Lockerbie trial and (2) the text of an e-mail sent today by Robbie to, amongst others, the First Minister and the Minister of Justice. The issue is the preservation of the wreckage from Pan Am 103. Items posted on this blog on 02 and 29 October 2007 are relevant.

(1) From: I.P.O.

To: RtP

Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:14 PM

Vienna, 7 November 2007

P/RE/20727

Dear Robbie!

I have received your message concerning the remains of the aircraft.

I agree with you that all forensic evidence, including the aircraft remains, has to be stored in a safe place where it can be assured that it will not be tampered with.

From here in Austria I cannot judge which is the best place. I do not know whether the Scottish authorities are capable of safe storage of this kind of sensitive items. So far, the judicial authorities' performance in this case is not very reassuring.

With best regards,

Hans Koechler

(2) Greetings Gentlemen,

This is forwarded for your interest. Leaving aside the obvious requirements of any criminal re-investigation there are two other dimensions to this situation which I respectfully urge you to consider.

If John Parkes and myself are right about an accidental explosion of two diplomatic freight crates of TOW missiles and/or their component parts, the perpetrators will have to find an alternative bomber and if we let that happen we have the blood of innocent civilians in Iran or Syria on our hands. It has the potential to fuel other agendas towards these two countries. Secondly, from a domestic transport perspective, we may have a serious problem regarding daily health and safety. Familiarity breeds both contempt and criminal practice, and if this illegal carriage of munitions samples, or 'returns' or any traffic at all flowing from the UK arms industry continues unchecked we may have another Lockerbie any minute. God forbid it came down over Glasgow. (Good advert for the Games.)

You may ask what has it to do with you, Mr Pict? I would simply answer that in certain circumstances of national interest we may need all hands to the pump. I am an ex-pilot who imediately understood the AIB report, I am en ex-RAF Policeman who has knowledge of what used to be transported on international flights - I watched and them being loaded whilst standing as an armed guard, my 35 years experience negotiating the Crown Office and the Courts has gifted me circumspection, I am not afraid to speak the truth and, as one of the sovereign people of Scotland, I say 'not in our name'.

After a period of not correcting or dealing with a problem, you own it. This will soon be said about reparations concerning the criminal extortion of tolls on the A87, especially while 129 convictions remain upheld and £33m has been taken from road-users - half a £million from Skye Transport hauliers alone!

With best regards,

Robbie.

Lockerbie: "Tampered evidence"

The Ulrich Lumpert story is still bubbling quietly away in the background. Here is a link to an account by Olivier Schmidt that is more thoughtful than many:
http://oraclesyndicate.twoday.net/stories/4418427/

Son of Qaddhafi: Strange Bedfellow?

This is a link to an article by Tom Ordeman Jr about Saif al Islam Gaddafi, the Leader's son. It is an interesting (if, possibly, slightly roseate) piece about his current, and perhaps future, influence on Libya's internal policies and external relations. The reason I'm mentioning it here is that it's yet another another commentary from an American source that simply assumes Libya's responsibility for the destruction of Pan Am 103. No mention of the SCCRC's reference back on the ground that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred in the conviction of Megrahi. See
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/challenges.php?id=1385216

When are the Americans going to wake up and smell the coffee?

Here is another article (in French) from a Saif admirer:
http://www.temoust.org/spip.php?article3820

Paul Gauci

"Contacted at their home, Paul Gauci, brother to witness Tony Gauci, was quoted by The Scotsman saying: 'We are under very heavy pressure here. The press want to photograph us, everybody wants to interview my brother, we have no privacy. When we step out the door, there are people with cameras. Our lives are intolerable here.'

This is from Malta Today at
http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/midweek/2007/10/31/n1.html
I have not been able to find the story on The Scotsman news website, but that is doubtless due to my own incompetence.

[A kind reader informs me that the reference is probably to the story in Scotland on Sunday http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=184&id=1641412007
which was mentioned on this blog on 14 October.]

A prison visit

Today I had a two-hour meeting in Her Majesty's Prison Greenock with Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, at his invitation (my first). Since the date of the trial court's verdict against him, my position has been a clear one: on the evidence led at the trial his conviction was simply an outrageous miscarriage of justice, about which the Scottish criminal justice system should feel nothing but shame. As a result of today's meeting I am satisfied that not only was there a wrongful conviction, but the victim of it was an innocent man. Lawyers, and I hope others, will appreciate this distinction.

I will not be disclosing the content of my discussions with Mr Megrahi, but I can say that he now speaks English with a fine Scottish accent (his first words to me were "Thank you for visiting me on such a dreich day") and that his taste in mints is impeccable.

["dreich" in relation to weather means dreary, cheerless, bleak. See http://www.dsl.ac.uk/]

Lockerbie - Time for the Truth

"In the early 1990’s I was being shown around some of the more affluent parts of Damascus. One particular building complex seemed to be under heavy guard by numerous men. I asked my guide what the building was, thinking it was an embassy or consulate. He shook his head and asked me 'Do you remember your Lockerbie air crash?' I said that I did. My guide nodded towards the building and simply said, 'He organized it.' I asked my guide who the 'he' in question was, but only received a pair of raised eyebrows and a tilt of the head as a response."

This is an excerpt from an article by Julian Worker on suite101.com subtitled "Revenge was the reason but the wrong country was blamed". See
http://middleeasternaffairs.suite101.com/article.cfm/lockerbie_time_for_the_truth

US confidence

The United States Consul-General in Edinburgh, Lisa Vickers, during a recent visit to Lockerbie, indicated that the US was confident in the ability of the Scottish criminal justice system to answer the remaining questions about the disaster.

"We are looking very interestedly at what is happening with the appeal," she said.

"Of course we have full faith and confidence in the Scottish judicial system to resolve the remaining questions."

See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/south_of_scotland/7067085.stm

19 years on and Lockerbie plane debris is rotting away in a scrapyard

This is the self-explanatory title of an article in today's Daily Mail. It contains a striking photograph of the scrapyard in question. See
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=490284&in_page_id=1770

An assiduous blogger, however, got there two months before the Daily Mail:
http://thesplund.blogspot.com/2007/08/graveyard-of-flight-103.html

The story has now been picked up by various organs of the press, including the New York Post:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10302007/news/worldnews/lockerbie_junk_pile.htm

Juval Aviv

For a hatchet-job on Juval Aviv, author of the Interfor Report on the destruction of Pan Am 103 and a contributor to Allan Francovich's film The Maltese Double Cross, see
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/10/secret-agent-sc.html

For a somewhat different view of Aviv, see http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/lockerbie/resources/story_aviv.html

Wikipedia and Lockerbie

This is a link to an interesting commentary, based on the researches of Dr Ludwig de Braeckeleer, asserting that Wikipedia articles on Pan Am 103 and Lockerbie have been systematically altered by a Wikipedia editor (pseudonym "SlimVirgin" but allegedly identified as Linda Mack -- a well-known name to Lockerbie buffs, and strongly suspected to be a MI5 asset or plant) in order more closely to reflect the "official" UK and US line on the Lockerbie disaster. See
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/russmag.html

Is Washington With Us?

Just out of interest, here's an example (and by no means the most virulent that could be provided) of the attitude of the right wing in the United States towards Libya and Lockerbie. It comes from a -- relatively -- mainstream American conservative publication.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/28863.html

Convicted Bomber of Pan Am Flight 103 May Have Been Wrongly Sentenced

One article emanating from the United States which does not blithely assume the guilt of Megrahi and of Libya for the Lockerbie bombing appears on the Media Monitors Network website. It is written by Ambassador Andrew Killgore, publisher of the influential Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (http://www.wrmea.com/). Dr Jim Swire is quoted, as am I. Perhaps unfortunately, the article places a great deal of stress on the revelations by "the golfer" about evidence fabrication which, of course, were dismissed by the SCCRC. See
http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/46864