[This is the headline over an article by Farouk Araie published today in the South African newspaper The Star. It reads as follows:]
Thirty-two years ago Pan Am 103 exploded over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was the only man convicted of the worst terrorist crime in UK history. He has proclaimed his innocence and unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction.
A new suspect has been charged 32 years later. Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud is alleged to have built the bomb and worked with Megrahi to carry out the attack.
The case of Megrahi was a complex one since the day he was indicted on 270 counts of murder in November 1991.
Malta has been dogged over the past 32 years by the Lockerbie prosecution’s contention that the bomb responsible for one of the most heinous terrorist acts in history began it’s deadly flight on an Air Malta flight out of Luqa. Many nations have conspired to cover up the true identities of those responsible for planning and executing the Lockerbie crash.
The shocking truth is that Western intelligence agencies were complicit in the murders. From the moment the plane went down, a supposedly impartial investigation was distorted to conceal this dark reality from the victims’ relatives and the public.
Many analysts believe that Megrahi was framed and that the Scottish government was part of the cover-up.
No one in authority has the guts to reveal the truth about the bombing. The British government, in effect, blackmailed Megrahi into dropping his appeal as a condition of his release.
Had the appeal gone to a higher court, new and suppressed evidence would have shown that a fragment of a circuit bomb and bomb timer, discovered in the countryside of Lockerbie, and said to have been in Megrahi’s suitcase, was a plant. A forensic scientist found no trace of an explosion on it. The evidence would demonstrate the impossibility of the bomb beginning its journey at Malta before it was allegedly transferred through two airports undetected to flight 103.
Megrahi’s trial was a politically influenced sham from the start, in which key witnesses were bribed and coached and crucial evidence was tampered with. New witnesses and crucial evidence would have shown that it was impossible for Megrahi to have bought the clothes that were found in the wreckage of Pan Am 103.
The accused was convicted on the word of a Maltese shop owner who claims to have sold him the clothes, then gave a false description of him in 19 separate statements ...
During the course of our lifetime, someday, someone will reveal the ultimate truth.
[RB: The Hogmanay edition of The National covers this story in a report headlined Lockerbie bombing: Western intelligence agencies ‘complicit’ in disaster.]
>>> continuation
ReplyDelete3.) There is no proof that Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - only because of the intelligence passport, with alias name under "Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad" - with the real photo of Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - had anything to do with an "IED bomb case" or the clothes purchase at Gauci.
The double passport was used for other intelligence operations. Al Megrahi produced the "alias passport" early during questioning and personally brought the passport to court after in "The Hague" in 1998.
4.) There is no real circumstantial evidence that the bomb suitcase was transported from Malta via Frankfurt to Heathrow and loaded onto flight PA'103 to New York....
On the basis of suspicions an alternative scenario must be investigated about passenger (Mougrabi) and the transport of a possible bomb suitcase - from Cyprus, with flight CY'1364, Cyprus Airways, to Heathrow on 21 December 1988, and reloaded onto PanAm'103. There was talk about the “Cyprus connection” at the Court, but the further travel destination of Mr Mougrabi or his stay in London, remains in the dark.
5.) MEBO Investigation Result: Mr Abdelbasset Al Megrahi, as well as a MEBO MST-13 timer fragment (PT35, PT35/b, PT35/B) and a Toshiba Radiorecorder (RT-8016-SF16) have nothing to do with the "Lockerbie Affair / PanAm103"; will soon be proven by the ongoing Appeal or the Criminal Complaint, filed by MEBO, against Police Scotland (Operation Sandwood) and could be costly for Mr Ken, because he is also responsible for creating considerable reputational damage to the detriment of MEBO Ltd & Edwin Bollier and Others.
Summary: MEBO thinks that the Lockerbie-disaster has been abused to conspire against LIBYA and has used the firm MEBO ltd., as its link. Lockerbie could become a "hot potato" for Ken and Attorney William Barr.
It is highly important that Agila Mohammad MASUD, can come to a court interrogation in a neutral location e.g. UN (United Nations) Geneva/Switzerland
The further search for the real culprits must be directed in another direction!
LINK:
https://gosint.wordpress.com/lockerbie-three-decades
and
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qTzisla5E9qv/?fbclid
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1cNzH4j6_Q
and
https://www.facebook.com/edwin.bollier/posts/2846610552084985
by PRIVAT INVESTIGATOR, FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd Telecommunication Switzerland, webpage: www.lockerbie.ch
The new suspect in the "Lockerbie affair PanAm103" > Agila Mohammad MASUD, needs to be interrogated in a neutral place...
ReplyDeleteThis politically tinged "Christmas treat" about the "Lockerbie SAGA" - excellent and impressive announced by outgoing US Attorney General William Barr, on 32nd anniversary of the airline bombing, flight PanAm103, that killed 270 people - was hopefully his last possible "Cover-up" (LIE) in his life...
If, according to William Barr, as early as 1991, Agila Mohammad MASUD, was suspected of being the bomb-maker in the "Lockerbie case", why was he not at least listed and call up 2000/01, as a witness in the "Lockerbie trial"? There were several questions about MASUD at the Court in Zeist... (see Court transcript).
This new "decade" against LIBYA was started by the questionable video film "My Brother’s Bomber", by Ken Dornstein, USA.
It is respectful - that a brother who lost his brother in an assassination attempt - tries to find the real perpetrators and background of the assassination attempt on PanAm103; but what Mr Ken was trying to do with his mostly, provable LIES > in the "soft- and hardware" description, is extremely perfidious and nasty.!
Ken was personally at important places and addresses which appear in the"Lockerbie Saga", so at Dr Jim Swire home in Scotland, at MEBO/Edwin Bollier, in Switzerland, in Malta, BERLIN, Tripoli LIBYA, etc...
When Ken came to MEBO AG in Zurich for 2-3 days with his team, he was generously and comprehensively presented by Edwin Bollier, through software and hardware, with our evidence against the UK & USA Indictment - i.e. in favour of LIBYA and Abdelbaset Al Megrahi - for examination.
Ken was informed at MEBO how Badri Hassan, with his company ABH, haddeliberate implicated Mr Al Megrahi in the "Lockerbie disaster" etc.In order to appear convincing and serious, in Ken's film "My Brother’s Bomber",his allegation scenes were "coated" to 90% with correct media film reports around the 'Lockerbie Tragedy'; rest 10% highly questionable and defamatory!
As the Libyan Minister of Interior demands the formation of a "legal-political" team to defend LIBYA in the newly opened "Lockerbie case". We hope that the accused Agila Mohammad MASUD, can come to a neutral court interrogation e.g. at UN in Geneva/Switzerland, in the presence of USA and UK officials & judges.
He should have the possibility to comment - neutrally without influence - about the accusations that he is the bomb maker in the "Lockerbie case". The following decisive facts can already today be demonstrably set against Ken's and the, legally valid Scottish circumstantial verdict:
1.) False testimony of official witnesses under oath: No "dark charred " MST13 Timer Circuit Board, (PT35) was found or discovered on May 12, 1989; all further facts in this context can be proven today as "Scottish Evidence Fraud and LIE's" (Soft- & Hardware Evidence Fraud).
(Perjury Act 1911 CHAPTER 61 and 2Geo 5)
2.) Although Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, was in Malta on 7th December 1988, Al Megrahi cannot be verified as a clothes buyer - who according to Tony Gauci's claim (court testimony, 2000/01, sworn) - bought various clothes on the same day 7/12/1988, at his boutique "Mary's House"!
Today it is proven that the unknown "clothes buyer" visited Tony Gauci on December 23, 1988, and bought clothes; important: Al Megrahi, was not in Malta on this date 23/12/1988 (Police confirmation)
continuation >>>