The Lockerbie Case: Credibility and Thurman, Gauci, Feraday

Thursday 28 March 2013

Credibility and Thurman, Gauci, Feraday

Posted on Oh No! Not another Lockerbie Blog... today is an item headed The Credible Witnesses of the Lockerbie Trial. It considers the evidence of Thomas Thurman [RB: Thurman was not, of course, a witness at Zeist but he it was who “identified” the dodgy circuit board fragment PT/35(b) as supposedly coming from a MST-13 timer]; Tony Gauci; and Alan Feraday. Further witnesses are to be dealt with in subsequent posts.

Note for those of impaired judgment: the description of these witnesses as “credible” in the post’s title is ironical.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.