For more than 20 years Norfolk man Martin Cadman has
fought to uncover the true story behind his son Bill’s death in the Lockerbie
disaster. Now Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the convicted bomber, is dead - but in
this interview published in the EDP in April, Mr Cadman and the author of a new
book explain why they believe he was innocent.
As Martin Cadman
prepared to leave a meeting at London’s US Embassy just over a year after his
son’s death aboard Pan Am flight 103, a member of the American Presidential
Commission drew him to one side. “Keep up the fight,” he said. “Your government
and ours know exactly what happened but they are never going to tell.”
Since then he
has kept fighting and today, more than 23 years after Bill Cadman and 269 other
people were killed, Mr Cadman has a filing cabinet in the study of his Burnham
Market home crammed with folders relating to the disaster and the subsequent
investigation. Despite this dogged research, exactly what happened remains a
mystery to him, though he has his suspicions. But one thing of which he is
certain is that it did not involve Libya or Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the man who
was convicted for the Lockerbie bombing in January 2001 at a trial under
Scottish law in the Netherlands, spent eight years in a Scottish prison and was
released on compassionate grounds after his diagnosis with terminal prostate
cancer.
Now comes the
publication of a book, co-authored by Megrahi, that presents new evidence
seemingly undermining what many considered an already flimsy case for is
prosecution, and this strengthens Mr Cadman’s view that there has been a
serious miscarriage of justice.
“I don’t think that Megrahi or Libya had anything to do
with it,” he said. “He has been made a scapegoat.” The bulk of Megrahi: You are my Jury – The Lockerbie Evidence
is written by John Ashton, a Brighton-based author who has studied the case for
18 years and worked as part of Megrahi’s defence team between 2006 and 2009.
Italicised passages written by Megrahi in the first person are interspersed
through Ashton’s detailed analysis of the bombing and its aftermath. The book
draws from a long-suppressed 800-page report by the Scottish Criminal Cases
Review Commission (SCCRC), which was compiled in 2007 and would have featured
in Megrahi’s second appeal against his conviction – but as is well known, he
dropped his appeal and accepted a quicker release on compassionate grounds
while remaining tainted with guilt as the convicted bomber.
Three major
points emerge from the report and Mr Ashton’s own research. First, the most
significant new evidence concerns the Toshiba cassette player that is believed
to have been converted into an explosive device and stowed within a brown
Samsonite suitcase in the luggage hold. This device featured a timer supposedly
identical to those known to have been purchased by Libya from a company called
Mebo, which purchased its circuit boards from a German firm called Thuring.
Mr Ashton said:
“This is something that the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission miss, and
it relates to the forensics. The crucial forensic item in the case that really
ties Megrahi and Libya in was this fragment of circuit board. We can
demonstrate forensically that the prosecution claim that this originated from a
timing device that was supplied to Libya is not true, because in the circuit
boards in those timing devices, the copper circuitry was coated with an alloy
of tin and lead. The Lockerbie one was coated with pure tin, which requires a
completely different manufacturing process, and one that was not used by
Thuring, the company that supplied those circuit boards.”
The second point
concerns the Crown’s most important witness, a Maltese shopkeeper named Tony
Gauci who, two months before the bombing, sold a man some clothes that were
later used to wrap the tape-recorder bomb within the suitcase. In Mr Ashton’s
words, Gauci’s initial “descriptions of the clothes purchaser all suggested the
man was around 50 years old, 6ft tall and with dark skin, whereas Megrahi was
36, is 5ft 8in and has light skin”.
But in 1991,
Gauci identified Megrahi as the man who entered his shop, selecting him from a
line-up of photographs, and in 1999, he picked Megrahi out again, this time in
person. “Before picking him out of the identity parade it turns out he’d had a
magazine that featured Megrahi’s photo for months, so he would have been
familiar with him. He’d had other newspaper and magazine articles as well, it
turned out.”
The SCCRC report
also established that he only gave evidence after asking for a $2m reward, and
that the Scottish police persuaded the US Department of Justice to pay this
sum, along with $1m for his brother, Paul. This fact was not disclosed to the
defence during the trial, and would have been of great value as they sought to
cast aspersions on the quality of Gauci’s evidence.
So if Mr Cadman,
Mr Ashton and Megrahi are correct, who really was responsible for the Lockerbie
bombing? Herein lies the third major aspect of the book’s case.
In July 1988, an
American warship, the USS Vincennes, shot down Iran Air flight 655 from Bandar
Abbas to Dubai as it flew over the Persian Gulf, killing 290 passengers.
“This Iranian
airbus was taking people to the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca,” said Mr Cadman,
aged 87. “We never got an answer from the Americans as to why they shot down an
innocent airbus.”
Instead of
issuing an explanation or apology for the loss of innocent lives, the Ronald
Reagan administration gave the USS Vincennes crew the Combat Action Ribbon.
Five months after this attack, on December 21, 1988, came the Lockerbie
bombing.
“It was a
revenge thing, probably – Iran saying ‘we’re going to have the same number of
yours as you killed of ours’,” said Mr Cadman. The investigators’ initial
suspicion was indeed directed at Iran – specifically an Iranian-backed
Palestinian terrorist group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
– General Command (PFLP-GC). This group had splintered from the Palestinian
Liberation Organisation (PLO) and had already massacred civilians in Israel and
Europe. In particular, the focus was on one man, Mohammed Abu Talb, who was
given a life sentence in 1989 for attacks on Jewish targets. He is believed to
have been freed from prison in 2009, shortly after Megrahi.
Mr Ashton said:
“The key things about this group are: one, they built bombs into Toshiba radio
cassette players; two, they built bombs that were designed to blow up aircraft;
and three, the cell was based in West Germany, which is where the flight began
its journey. There was a feeder flight called Pan Am 103A, and the flight that
exploded was Pan Am flight 103.
“Although some
of the group were rounded up two months before Lockerbie, some of their bombs
went missing and some of the personnel were not rounded up. There was a warning
issued in December 1988... The State Department circulated a warning which said
that a group of Palestinian militants were heading to Europe and were planning
to target Pan Am.” Mr Ashton said that that warning’s existence was not
revealed until seven years after the Lockerbie disaster. He added: “So those
things combine to make me think they did it – and Iran, of course, had the
motive.”
Bill Cadman and
his girlfriend were among 259 people to have died in the aeroplane on December
21, 1988, along with 11 more at the crash site in the small Scottish town of
Lockerbie. Bill was 32 and building a successful career as a sound engineer
responsible for the audio quality at West End musicals such as Les Miserables.
He and his girlfriend were en route to America for Christmas. “They shouldn’t
have been on the flight,” said Mr Cadman. “I think my son was trying to buy the
tickets last minute, and he hadn’t got the money, but his girlfriend produced
the money, otherwise they wouldn’t have been on the flight.”
Over the years
he and his wife Rita, who now lives in a care home in Fakenham, had the support
of a number of politicians such as Henry Bellingham, the Conservative MP for
North-West Norfolk, and Tam Dalyell, the former Labour member for Linlithgow.
Both politicians
had great respect for Mr Cadman – as does Mr Ashton. “I’ve dealt with Martin,
he’s a very good man,” he said. “He’s been very dogged over the years. He
deserves better than he’s got, all the relatives do. It’s only with the help of
people like him that we keep all this on the agenda.”
Mr Ashton’s hope
is that this book will result in a public inquiry in Scotland. “I think the
chances of getting the people who really did it are very slight. The best we
can hope for is a full inquiry. At the very least it needs to look into why all
this evidence was withheld, but what we really need is the full inquiry which
will answer the questions of Martin and others, which are: why were the
warnings ignored, and what happened within the investigation that led to the
PFLP-GC and Iran being dropped as suspects. And, on top of that, we need to get
Megrahi’s case back to the appeal court. There is a mechanism for doing that –
an application could be made to the SCCRC, and his family are being encouraged
to do that.”
However, he is
sure that Megrahi will not live to see this happen. When Megrahi returned home
to Libya to die, his arrival prompted scenes of joy that disgusted many Britons
and Americans, not least the many victims’ relatives who believe that he is a
murderer.
Megrahi’s heroic
status in his home country, however, owed nothing to the idea that he had
struck a murderous blow against an American airliner; instead he is seen as an
innocent man who sacrificed his liberty for the sake of the nation’s economy.
In 2003, Muammar Gadaffi accepted Libyan responsibility for the atrocity and
paid compensation to the victims’ families in order to have crippling sanctions
lifted – and at the same time let it be known that he was doing so as an
economic tactic rather than a true acceptance of guilt.
Megrahi
describes his release from prison in the book: “The decision provoked a
carnival of political pointscoring, which kept the issue at the top of the news
agenda for over a fortnight. The controversy was entirely founded on the
assumption that I was the Lockerbie bomber. Very little of the media and
political comment acknowledged that I had had an appeal pending and that the
SCCRC considered the original verdict was ‘at least arguably one which no
reasonable court, properly directed, could have returned’.”
Mr Cadman does
not know whether he will see someone else convicted for his son’s murder. He is
sure of one thing, however, after that conversation at the embassy.
“I remember that
he said ‘There are some things that you will hear about that are right, but you
won’t hear all of it. And no one here is going to tell you everything.’ And
that is rather frightening. There are these few people who are in the know, and
the rest of us who are not.”
Megrahi: You are my Jury – The Lockerbie Evidence, by John Ashton, is published by Birlinn at £14.99.
Robert Fisk writes "the bag containing the bomb was actually put on the baggage carousel for checking in by the passenger's Lebanese handler",
ReplyDeleteWhat baggage carousel do you have at check-in?
Dear Baz... Fisk is one of the most reputable journos around. I expect he meant the rolling trolley thingie you put baggage on to be weighed, and which then shuttles the bags away to the cargo handling area. It could, loosely, be considered a carousel - it's just a different end of the same universal mechanised handling system.
ReplyDeleteIf that is the best you can come up with to undermine the argument that Others were involved in planting the bomb on that plane, I suggest you go back to playing with your Meccano set. Or whatever part of your own anatomy you prefer to play with.
Clear evidence remains that Megrahi was the fall-guy in some dirty business that has been the subject of a cover-up at the highest level.
Nothing unusual when the US government and its bumbling agencies are involved.