The Lockerbie Case: Megrahi data protection "myth" over SCCRC disclosure rebutted

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Megrahi data protection "myth" over SCCRC disclosure rebutted

This is the headline over a news item published today on the website of Scottish lawyers’ magazine The Firm. It deals with (and gives the full text of) the recent supplementary submission by Justice for Megrahi to the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee on data protection issues alleged to arise in the context of disclosure of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission’s Statement of Reasons in the Megrahi case.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.