The Lockerbie Case: The big lie

Sunday 25 September 2011

The big lie

This is part of the title of the first instalment of a lengthy article (mainly in German) published today on the website Das Treiben der Lämmer. It sets out, with useful references to published material (usually in English), the main gaps and deficiencies in the evidence that resulted in the conviction of Abdelbaset Megrahi. For those with a reading knowledge of German, this is a helpful introduction to Lockerbie studies.

2 comments:

SM26 September, 2011
The automated Google-translation to English is quite good:

The Big Lie
ReplyDelete
Replies
ebol26 September, 2011
MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2011 (google translation, german/english):

The article "The Big Lie" opens the windows to the truth in the "Lockerbie-Affair" against Libya (NTC). The real atrocity on Pan Am 103 has a different background ...
Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and Libya have to do nothing with the "Lockerbie-Tragedy" !

Please visit Friends of Justice for Megrahi on facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/161241207237021/

+++
Der Artikel "Die grosse Lüge" öffnet die Fenster zur Wahrheit in der "Lockerbie-Affäre" gegen Libyen (NTC). Das reale Attentat auf PanAm 103 hat einen anderen Hintergrund...
Mr Abdelbaset Al Megrahi und Libya haben mit der "Lockerbie-Tragödie" nichts zutun !

Bitte unterstützen Sie "Freunde von Gerechtigkeit für Al Megrahi" auf "facebook": http://www.facebook.com/groups/161241207237021/

by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd., Switzerland. URL: www.lockerbie.ch
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.