The Lockerbie Case: A sobering reflection

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

A sobering reflection

I gained thirty-five new Twitter followers (@rblackqc) in under 24 hours by twittering yesterday on the (non)applicability of English injunctions in Scotland (and incidentally on the arrogance and ignorance of English lawyers) rather than my usual subjects of the Lockerbie case and the wrongful conviction of Abdelbaset Megrahi. How sad is that?

1 comment:

blogiston24 May, 2011
"I gained thirty-five new Twitter followers...... How sad is that?"
That's because your blog subject doesn't contain any A-List celebs shagging each other, unfortunately.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.