Saturday 4 July 2009

Lockerbie relatives to demand Megrahi stays in Scots jail

Kenny MacAskill is to be put under intense pressure to keep the Lockerbie bomber behind bars in Scotland this week when he takes part in discussions with the families of the American victims.

The justice secretary will hear a heartfelt plea from Americans who lost loved ones in the atrocity and who firmly believe that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi should die in a Scottish prison.

MacAskill will hear that American families are "shocked and horrified" that Scottish ministers are considering whether Megrahi should be sent back home to Libya under the terms of a controversial prisoner transfer agreement struck by Tony Blair and Muammar Gaddaffi.

MacAskill will speak with the relatives during a video conference that will link Edinburgh with the British Embassy in Washington.

MacAskill has already been in touch with the US Attorney General Eric Holder, who is understood to have informed the justice secretary that Megrahi, who is terminally ill with prostate cancer, should stay in HMP Greenock.

That message will be rammed home on Thursday by the American families, who firmly believe Megrahi was responsible for the murder of 270 people when Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over Lockerbie 20 years ago.

Last night Frank Duggan, a Washington lawyer who is president of the Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, said: "The American relatives have never had the opportunity to make victim impact statements. It will be very emotional. They will talk about what their loss means to them – 20 years of missed grandchildren, missed weddings, all of the things that go on in life. It is especially distressing for those who lost young people – so many of them would have made a difference.

"He should stay in prison in Scotland. That was the agreement. The position of the US government is that he should serve his sentence in Scotland and that will be the overwhelming message to MacAskill."

A letter to MacAskill written by Kathleen Flynn, a mother who lost her son John Patrick Flynn on the night that the aircraft exploded, sums up the families' attitude.

"We are shocked and horrified that the convicted bomber of this horrific crime is being considered for a prisoner-transfer agreement to his native country, Libya," she said.

"I would hope that you would include the (views] of the majority of victims of the Pan Am 103 bombing – the 189 Americans lost on the flight."

MacAskill and Alex Salmond face one of the most taxing dilemmas of the SNP's reign as they decide what to do with the former Libyan intelligence agent who was convicted of the atrocity in the Scottish courts.

There is a vocal body of opinion who believe that Megrahi has been the victim of a huge miscarriage of justice. He is currently appealing against his conviction.

Among those convinced of his innocence is Jim Swire, a retired British GP who lost his daughter in the bombing.

Swire said: "Of course the Americans are saying that he is guilty. Their administration has told them that he is guilty. But I don't think they have questioned the quality of the evidence."

[The above is the text of an article in the Scotland on Sunday edition of 5 July.]

5 comments:

  1. I don't quite understand why MacAskill wants to talk to the relatives about sending Megrahi to Libya when it has been said the decision whether to exchange Megrahi will be a judicial one alone.

    Instead of wasting time of which Megrahi has so little why doesn't MacAskill get on with it.

    Or is there another reason? Is the UK government still deciding which option to take to remove Megrahi - the prisoner exchange or the appeal judges setting him free at the first stage of the appeal. If the outcry of the American relatives is so strong will they go for the appeal decision?

    ReplyDelete
  2. With respect to the families of the Victims of PanAm 103 - the 189 Americans lost here life on the flight.

    The quality of the Defence Evidence for the political hostage
    and victim, no. 271, Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi (10 years innocently in Scottish prisons) can be examined on document no. 651, no. 657 and others, on Wepbage: http://www.lockerbie.ch

    The trial before the Reappeal was far from fair and proper!

    We are neither pessimistic nor optimistic about Megrahi's appeal, but we are determined to reveal the Scottish miscarriage of justice with our exonerating evidence and thus help to rehabilitate Libya and give Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi his honour back.

    We will prove that Libya and Mr Al Megrahi had absolutely nothing to do with the PanAm 103 bombing!

    by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd., Switzerland

    ReplyDelete
  3. Clipper 'Maid of the Seas', PanAm 103, who tried to bring you back in the sea?

    Provably not Libya and its official Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi ! The coincidence justice, wanted to leave proof traces, so that innocent cannot be incriminate !

    Today can be excluded, free of doubts: Libya, Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi as cloths buyer with Gauci' s Mary House in Malta, a alleged Bomb-bag transported from AirMalta KM-180, to Frankfurt, the Feederflight PA-103/b, with the alleged Bomb-bag, transferd to London-Heathrow and the MST-13 timer !

    Dear 'Maid of the Sea', please announce us the correct bombers and the true background of your assassination...

    by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would say that its all depends upon the judge? Keep all the things in mind he will have to take the decision.

    Criminal law firms

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't for one minute believe the decision will be the judges. It will be a decision made by the permanent unelected government and it will be a decision which will best protect their interests ie hide as much as possible from the public of what really happened at Lockerbie

    ReplyDelete