The Lockerbie Case: More on alleged Iranian responsibility for Lockerbie

Tuesday 8 July 2008

More on alleged Iranian responsibility for Lockerbie

Here is a lengthy story (including interview and podcast) about an alleged Iranian CIA operative or asset who claims that Iran was responsible for the destruction of Pan Am 103.

4 comments:

Adam08 July, 2008
another hearsay statement, it seems. No real insider footprint.
Bo Adam
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous09 July, 2008
An allegation is no where as good as evidence. This is just another allegation which cannot be proven. However, even taking him at his word he seems to implicate Libya so Mr. Megrahi may not get off the hook so easily.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous10 July, 2008
Dear Robert,

I am affraid this person is a fabricator. What he is alleging about the nuclear program is not correct. He got the date seriously off. What he gets right is known from a document declassified by Rafsanjani in October 2006. A former CIA operative told me that he is a phony...
Best, Ludwig De Braeckeleer
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous11 July, 2008
Yet another loon.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.