The Lockerbie Case: Scotland's "heavies" on the procedural hearing

Friday 21 December 2007

Scotland's "heavies" on the procedural hearing

Here are links to the coverage of the second procedural hearing by the Scottish "serious" daily newspapers, The Herald and The Scotsman:
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.1920715.0.Judge_raps_law_chiefs_for_delays_to_Lockerbie_document.php
and
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Angiolini-rapped-over-Lockerbie-file.3611641.jp

These stories must make dismal reading for the Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini QC and the Advocate General for Scotland, Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC, since they focus on the reprimand issued by the court over their respective failures to canvass fully and candidly, in their written answers to the appellant's application for disclosure of the withheld document, their reasons for opposing disclosure, thus causing unnecessary delay to the proceedings.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments

Readers are invited to comment on blog posts. All comments require to be pre-moderated by me, and I shall reject all (a) that are not related to the Lockerbie disaster or (b) that fail to meet my -- perhaps idiosyncratic -- standards of courtesy towards other contributors. Comments will not be rejected simply because I disagree with them or because I, or other contributors, find them irritating. But comments will be rejected if they distort or misrepresent the evidence; are defamatory; or if they risk embroiling me, as publisher, in defamation proceedings. I am perfectly relaxed about being sued in respect of material which I personally have posted -- but not in respect of material that others wish to post as comments and which, in any case, I often strongly disagree with.

Particularly during my sojourns in South Africa, it may not be possible for me to perform the moderation function speedily. I regret the necessity of moderation but it has been rendered inevitable by the behaviour of a particular commentator whose contributions will always and without exception be rejected.

No correspondence will be entered into regarding moderation decisions.