tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post989845128351625310..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: It is vital that the truth is exposedRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-15708759958214608242014-07-15T16:39:51.821+01:002014-07-15T16:39:51.821+01:00It's quite inventive, though. It's not the...It's quite inventive, though. It's not the same as John Barry Smith's explanation for the explosion (which is quite batty and so far as I know has never been repeated by anyone else).<br /><br />Thinking about it though, it's no less batty, and also entirely fails to address the evidence that the centre of the break-up of the plane was right over that corner of AVE4041 and nothing to do with the cargo door which was recovered without any significant damage as regards explaining the disaster.Rolfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17849975010197698907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-37870896992881775342014-07-15T07:25:02.914+01:002014-07-15T07:25:02.914+01:00This is arrant nonsense, Dave. There is loads of e...This is arrant nonsense, Dave. There is loads of evidence of an explosion apart from the dodgy fragment. And no-one, but no-one, has ever described explosive decompression following the failure of a cargo door, or any other structural failure, as an IED. <br /><br />If you wish to continue posting comments on this blog, you must stop making things up.Robert Blackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-32818684097596137012014-07-14T23:23:26.644+01:002014-07-14T23:23:26.644+01:00An IED is not necessarily a bomb planted to explod...An IED is not necessarily a bomb planted to explode.<br /> <br />An IED could be a coincidental mix of everyday items that become explosive in particular circumstances e.g. explosive decompression.<br /><br />It is the timer fragment evidence that turns an IED into a bomb which is why it was needed to convict Megrahi and without it you have evidence of an explosion only. <br />Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15213240619989073000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-9426341290558174662014-07-14T19:43:10.761+01:002014-07-14T19:43:10.761+01:00The findings of the FAI in one respect - that of ...The findings of the FAI in one respect - that of the route taken by the IED - was based on the beliefs of those in charge of the criminal investigation, not the other way round, and had absolutely nothing to do with the absence or otherwise of any claim of responsibility.<br /><br />The conclusion that Pan Am 103 was brought down by an IED was based on physical evidence which could not have been faked and which, in the view of all save a few frootloops, was correctly interpreted in that respect.<br /><br />As for the BTF, it did not feature in the FAI as its supposed significance had not been discovered. We know now that it wasn't, as was claimed, part of one of the timers supplied to Libya. We don't know how or why or when it came to be in the chain of evidence, but it is irrelevant to the question of whether or not an IED caused the destruction of the aircraft.petehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05831322202596781171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-3909530602788184122014-07-14T12:11:27.784+01:002014-07-14T12:11:27.784+01:00Does the absence of a credible claim of responsibi...Does the absence of a credible claim of responsibility mean the criminal investigation was based on the findings of the FAI?<br /><br />But if their findings of an IED was based on the fragment and clothing evidence and this evidence is fake, does this make the FAI conclusion ‘fake’ too?<br />Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15213240619989073000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-11009063141113362702014-07-14T11:03:06.645+01:002014-07-14T11:03:06.645+01:00I find it quite astonishing that of their own voli...I find it quite astonishing that of their own volition Professor Black, Dr Swire and their associates have given the authorities the perfect excuse to procrastinate for another 5-10. Hasn't the opportunity to make proper submissions i.e.not "Operation Bird") been lost? Did Megrahi's lawyers even bother to raise the matter of the Heathrow origin or did they (or their researcher) plug yet again the risible claim the primary suitcase was introduced at Frankfurt in addition to a suitcase of drugs?<br /><br />Is the SCCRC a fair and objective tribunal? They stated explicitly they would not accept evidence of criminal wrongdoing based on perceived anomalies in dates ect.<br /><br />However my article "Hear No Evil,See No Evil, Speak No Evil" provided irrefutable evidence key evidence had been fabricated (based on an obviopus anomaly in the dates of two key exhibits) which Megrahi's defence team never noticed in 15 years. Had this been raised at Camp Zeist, the case would have collapsed even with a rigged tribunal and the defendants having had their right to a jury given away in favour of a judicial experiment.<br /><br />If the evidence of the MST-13 timer and the Bombeat manual was fabricated then what else was? The Malta clothing?<br /><br />If the SCCRC do not acknowledge the collapse of the evidential house of cards featured in chapter 8 & 9 of the Statement of Reasons what in God's name is the point of dumping a further three volumes of submissions? A job creation scheme for charlatans and fabricators?bazhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02338162927520376063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-72956541383810018672014-07-13T12:56:58.112+01:002014-07-13T12:56:58.112+01:00MISSION LIFE WITH THE 'LOCKERBIE AFFAIR', ...MISSION LIFE WITH THE 'LOCKERBIE AFFAIR', 2014:<br />News and Views in case of dispute in Switzerland decides after the Federal Court, the European Court of Justice. (ECHR). Only in german language:<br /><br />http://www.blick.ch/news/politik/fremde-richter-was-verschweigt-der-bundesrat-id2981602.html<br />+++ <br />Bei Streitigkeiten in der Schweiz entscheidet nach dem Bundesgericht, der Europäische Gerichtshof. (EMRK).<br /><br />by Edwin Bollier, MEBO LTD. Telecommunication Switzerland. Webpage: www.lockerbie.ch<br />ebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.com