tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post5929263677042091182..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: Justice Committee report on SCCRC disclosure BillRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-77151758849231600402012-04-01T17:18:16.884+01:002012-04-01T17:18:16.884+01:00resumption >>>
Entitled question:
Was th...resumption >>><br /><br />Entitled question:<br />Was the ex security "BUPO" in Switzerland the unknown state which had delivered 1996, under national security, a document to the Crown Office, about the clear facts over the MEBO MST-13 Timerfragment ? Facts pointing in this direction...<br /><br />Clancy said the document had not come from the United States or its agencies like the CIA, although he did not disclose the country involved.<br /><br />Parts of Statement by Dr Hans Koechler, International Observer, appointed by the United Nations, at the Scottish Court in the Netherlands (Lockerbie Trial), on the withholding of supposedly secret evidence from the Defense by order of the Government of the United Kingdom<br /><br />The invocation of “Public Interest Immunity” (PII) – unprecedented in the history of Scottish criminal justice – is tantamount to political interference into the Appeal Court’s conduct. It is obvious that criminal proceedings cannot be fair if the Defense is denied access to a piece of evidence (document) which has been revealed to the Prosecution. <br />Under the highly politicized circumstances of the Lockerbie Trial, the issuing of a PII certificate by the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom appears to be a rather desperate measure to influence the conduct of the court in a manner favorable to the British Government; it further strains the constitutional relations between Scotland and the United Kingdom.<br /><br />by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland. URL: www.lockerbie.chebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-77962275893585679252012-04-01T17:17:31.049+01:002012-04-01T17:17:31.049+01:00MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2012, doc. nr. 7113.rtf.
For th...MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2012, doc. nr. 7113.rtf.<br />For the Scottish Parliament to think and act!<br />Governmental interference, political intrigues and<br />suppression instead of civil and human rights...<br /><br />SCCRC CHAPTER 25....25.1 In 2006 Crown Office: Undisclosed protectively marked documents:<br />In 2006 Crown Office informed the Commission of the existence of two protectively marked documents in its possession. These documents *(inkl.PII) were madeavaiblable for viewing by a member of the Commission's enquiry team on 21 September 2006 at Dumfries police station on the condition that they would be treated as if they had been suppled under the minute of agreement between the Commission an D&G.<br />+++<br />*13. Sept. 1996, the Crown Office received a Document (PII) from an unknown state under national security.<br /><br />The secret documents which could prove the innocence of the man Abdelbaset al Megrahi, convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, are being hold by a secret government.<br />The Appeal Court in Edinburgh was reported on (20.2.2008) that Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC had agreed to open the secret text in the document under "national security" which can relieves Libya and its official Mr Megrahi. But the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!<br /><br />continued below >>>ebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-1479905841920429712012-04-01T10:55:18.905+01:002012-04-01T10:55:18.905+01:00MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2012, doc. nr. 7113.rtf.
For th...MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2012, doc. nr. 7113.rtf.<br />For the Scottish Parliament to think and act!<br />Governmental interference, political intrigues and<br />suppression instead of civil and human rights...<br /><br />SCCRC CHAPTER 25...25.1 In 2006 Crown Office: Undisclosed protectively marked documents:<br />In 2006 Crown Office informed the Commission of the existence of two protectively marked documents in its possession. These documents *(inkl.PII) were madeavaiblable for viewing by a member of the Commission's enquiry team on 21 September 2006 at Dumfries police station on the condition that they would be treated as if they had been suppled under the minute of agreement between the Commission an D&G.<br />+++<br />*13. Sept. 1996, the Crown Office received a Document (PII) from an unknown state under national security.<br /><br />The secret documents which could prove the innocence of the man Abdelbaset al Megrahi, convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, are being hold by a secret government.<br />The Appeal Court in Edinburgh was reported on (20.2.2008) that Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini QC had agreed to open the secret text in the document under "national security" which can relieves Libya and its official Mr Megrahi. But the UK Government by Advocate General Lord Davidson QC, blocked the progress and has argued that it is not in the public interest to release the secret document. He claimed: "The national security was at stake"!<br /><br />Entitled question:<br />Was the ex security "BUPO" in Switzerland the unknown state which had delivered 1996, under national security, a document to the Crown Office, about the clear facts over the MEBO MST-13 Timerfragment ? Facts pointing in this direction...<br /><br />Clancy said the document had not come from the United States or its agencies like the CIA, although he did not disclose the country involved.<br /><br />Parts of Statement by Dr Hans Koechler, International Observer, appointed by the United Nations, at the Scottish Court in the Netherlands (Lockerbie Trial), on the withholding of supposedly secret evidence from the Defense by order of the Government of the United Kingdom<br /><br />The invocation of “Public Interest Immunity” (PII) – unprecedented in the history of Scottish criminal justice – is tantamount to political interference into the Appeal Court’s conduct. It is obvious that criminal proceedings cannot be fair if the Defense is denied access to a piece of evidence (document) which has been revealed to the Prosecution.<br /> <br />Under the highly politicized circumstances of the Lockerbie Trial, the issuing of a PII certificate by the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom appears to be a rather desperate measure to influence the conduct of the court in a manner favorable to the British Government; it further strains the constitutional relations between Scotland and the United Kingdom.<br /><br />by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Switzerland. URL: www.lockerbie.chebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.com