tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post5523333012153177160..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: Why was compelling evidence of Heathrow insertion sidelined by police? Robert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-66312376729055767232013-01-01T20:54:25.379+00:002013-01-01T20:54:25.379+00:00MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2013, doc. nr. 8893.rtf. (googl...MISSION LOCKERBIE, 2013, doc. nr. 8893.rtf. (google translation, german/english):<br /><br />Bollier/MEBO has right. Definitely not a "bomb bag" transfer from AirMalta, KM 180 on PanAm-103/a at airport Frankfurt !<br />Who dares contradict this well-founded fact ? <br /><br />A clerk of the luggage conveyancing system in Frankfurt, confirmed MEBO's control flow through the transfer of luggage on the Shuttle flight, PanAm 103/a, in Frankfurt.<br /><br />The alleged "bomb suitcase," was together with the inter-line luggage from AirMalta, KM-180 almost simultaneous on the same counter V3, nr.206, coded and got the Tray nr. B-8849 at 1: 07 pm, on 21st Dec. 1988.<br />It is verifiably proved that the suitcase, tray B-8849 was a accompanied reale on-line suitcase of PanAm flight PA-643, from Berlin and was 'wrong' coded as inter-line suitcase, about technical reasons !<br />The case tray B-8849 were accompanied by passenger nr.131, W. Wagenführ, and the check-out. was demonstrated at Heathrow.<br /><br />The evidence is so easily verifiable: <br />It was at the Court in Kamp van Zeist undisputed, that only 25 inter-line luggage items over the counter in Hall Middle 'HM' and 'V3' - were coded and then transfered to PanAm 103/a.<br />(Statement of witness nr.799, Gunther Kasteleiner 'FAG')<br /><br />Fact is: there existed only 13 pieces real inter-line bags, which were coded via the inter-line counter 'V3', nr.2, nr.3, nr.5 and 'HM' nr.203 and nr.204, then after controlled by x-ray, the bags were transferred to <br />PanAm 103/a for direction London Heathrow. <br /><br />These 13 bags can be assigned to demonstrably and unequivocally to passengers or flight numbers.<br /><br />The 12 piece of on-line bags of PanAm shuttle flights from Berlin, PA-107, PA 637, PA 639 and PA-643, which not have been controlled by x-ray in Frankfurt, a second time - were 11 pieces on-line bags were demonstrably via counter 'HM', nr.4, "wrong" coded as inter-line bags, about technical reasons. <br /><br />1 on-line suitcase of flight PA-643 from Berlin, also was 'wrong' coded as inter-line bag tray B-8849, about technical-reasons, via V3 counter, nr.206, and therefore not a second time by x-ray controled.<br />This suitcase were accompanied and owned of passenger nr.131, W. Wagenführ !<br /><br />First Balance is consistent: 13 units real inter-line bags + 12 pieces 'wrong' coded as inter-line bags (because online) + 1piece 'wrong' coded inter-line case, tray no. B-8849 (because on-line) gives total 25 inter-line units. <br /><br />Second Balance: 13 real inter-line bags controlled through x-ray checks, supported from Maier's (x-ray report) + 12 non-real inter-line bags which were not controlled by x-ray checks = Total 25 coded as inter-line suitcases and transfered on PanAm 103/a in Frankfurt.<br /><br />Thus witness No.799, Gunther Kasteleiner (sworn) traffic assistant 'FAG', called FA11 division, is responsible for this fatal error, inter-line, instead of correctly on-line, solely the bag tray B-8849, could be assigned to AirMalta flight KM 180 !<br /><br />by Edwin Bollier, MEBO LTD, Switzerland. URL: www.lockerbie.chebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.com