tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post4707243594931259037..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: Lawyer calls for fresh appeal over Lockerbie bombingRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-1013209285193901082016-05-18T17:18:42.004+01:002016-05-18T17:18:42.004+01:00Precisely. If the judges had not found in fact tha...Precisely. If the judges had not found in fact that Megrahi was the purchaser they would not, and in law could not, have convicted him having regard to the other evidence (accepted *and* rejected) in the case.Robert Blackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-22718244930263191922016-05-18T17:12:27.940+01:002016-05-18T17:12:27.940+01:00It seems that somewhere along the way Kenny has re...It seems that somewhere along the way Kenny has read and understood the SCCRC's findings that the 'identification' of Megrahi by Tony Gauci has been discredited. It's a pity he seems not to have read and understood their finding that <br /> <i> It is sufficient to say that in the Commission’s view any finding that a reasonable court could not have inferred that the applicant was the purchaser would render the remaining evidence against him insufficient to convict.</i><br />petehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05831322202596781171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-33279736735100225962016-05-18T16:39:28.095+01:002016-05-18T16:39:28.095+01:00So why will they not admit that they knew Megrahi ...So why will they not admit that they knew Megrahi was not guilty. Instead they are pursueing the "Acomplaices" of an innocent. Something smells very bad here.It smells very "Oily" which is what it has been all about right from the very start.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08941540274712417938noreply@blogger.com