tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post2370045125788411150..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: Your assumption of Megrahi’s guilt is based on no more than the fact that he was convictedRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-2521854538500556842012-05-29T07:28:25.794+01:002012-05-29T07:28:25.794+01:00Like a script excerpt from Garrow's Law...had ...Like a script excerpt from Garrow's Law...had me looking up the date of the Lockerbie disaster in doubt. Yes, it was only 1988, I thought as much.blogistonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10018834341706249710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-42925771430681836632012-05-28T18:06:57.280+01:002012-05-28T18:06:57.280+01:00The last few paragraphs of Wolchover's paper (...The last few paragraphs of Wolchover's paper ("Culprits of Lockberbie" are naturally interesting to a Nat activist like me. Noting the launch of the 'Yes' campaign for independence, near coincident with the death of Megrahi, perhaps JFM in Scotland should consider a parallel campaign: 'Yes - but only if...'Vronskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17797785918817375436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-35208976385267691402012-05-28T16:12:00.801+01:002012-05-28T16:12:00.801+01:00I quite agree. Sod the economy Dave should be loc...I quite agree. Sod the economy Dave should be locked in a room with Alex Salmond and not allowed to come out until he has read everything Mr Wolchover has written and answered all his imertinent and pompous questions.<br /><br />While Mr Wolchover thinks every word he or his pupil writes is a work of genius I hope he has corrected the wrong dates and other errors of fact.<br /><br /> He may also want to cut out some of the dubious claims he makes without evidence such as that Abu Talb was in Malta on the 23/11/88 or that Tom Thurman was at Tundergarth within hours of the bombing. As he denounces Interfor as a red herring perhaps it is not a good idea to quote from the charlatans and fabricators promoting this red herring including the convicted perjurer Lester Coleman.<br /><br />He might also want to drop the daft claim that Gaddafi had renounced terrorism in order to support Arafat's capitulation to the Zionist entity!<br /><br />I am not convinced by the idea "Abu Elias" took possession of the "fifth" device but Dave might go for it. Might be a good idea though to drop the line "without corroboration Khreesat's statement can hardly be taken as gospel" if you are going to take it as gospel without corroboration beyond the idea that(to you) "it ticks the right boxes."<br /><br />Did Mr Wolchover enclose for Dave's perusal the paper "Lockerbie: The True Culprits - A Postscript on Proof" (which seems to be of a different standard of literacy to his earlier more polished papers) in which he falsely claims that I challenged his credentials. I have no doubt he is a Barrister although he has some strange ideas about the rule of law.<br /><br />Perhaps Dave may have a question of his own such as who is Mr Wolchover representing? Is he simply acting as a concerned citizen? <br /><br />With quibbles some of his writing is very good but the claim that the Lockerbie bombing was the work of the PFLP-GC without official collusion or tolerance is an explanation I do not find adequate.bazhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02338162927520376063noreply@blogger.com