tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post2238044517177144619..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: “I wonder who killed our relatives?”Robert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-48025861624260517202015-12-09T15:10:10.708+00:002015-12-09T15:10:10.708+00:00If Libya did not bomb Pan Am 103, who did? Why wou...<i>If Libya did not bomb Pan Am 103, who did? Why would the United States present a case that didn’t hold up? Was the case ever expected to be brought to trial? Or was it basically a device for keeping Qaddafi in the doghouse with unproven charges?</i><br /><br />This.<br /><br /><i>Perhaps these twists and turns should not be unexpected, however — for the most significant surprise occurred on the day of the crash itself. According to its normal flight plan, Pan Am 103 “should” have blown up over the sea, where evidence of criminality never would have been found. Instead, unusually strong gale force winds that day led the pilot to fly north to get “above” the tempests — and thus to be over Scotland when the bomb exploded. Are the real criminals who blew up Pan Am 103 trembling in fear lest a fluke of nature that left evidence on the ground eventually will point to them?</i><br /><br />As I've said before, that's not true. Even if it had taken the more southerly route (and I've never seen any official confirmation that the "Daventry departure" taking the flight up across the Outer Hebrides wasn't perfectly standard) the plane couldn't have got anywhere near the Atlantic. It would still have been a fluke if it had landed in the Irish Sea. If you measure the distance flown, 38 minutes out of Heathrow on the southerly route crashes on Dublin. (I suppose Gaddafi's support for the IRA is difficult to square with this.)<br /><br />So many persistent factoids, it's like whack-a-mole. At least he didn't claim the plane was late.Rolfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16206952819245786811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-54469618110298449752015-12-09T12:36:41.485+00:002015-12-09T12:36:41.485+00:00DOSSIERS LOCKERBIE, 2015 >>> After the cr...DOSSIERS LOCKERBIE, 2015 >>> After the crash of PanAm 103, the truth collapset...<br /><br />The prosecution’s operating theory that the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, was a revenge for the US bombing of Tripoli in 1986, was a mere allegation !<br /><br />In memory of clarification: Colonel Gaddafi's announcement 1986 > to the United States:<br /><br />After the bombing on Libya by the United States, on 15 April 1986, Leader Gaddafi gave among other things, the following announcement - via MEBO studio link, on radio 'Arab Voice' in Tripoli:<br /><br />"The country is now officially renamed the "Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriyah"...<br />"Reconciliation between Libya and the United States was impossible so long as Reagan is in the White House; of the president he said, He is mad, He is foolish, He is an dog."<br /><br />Gaddafi said he had no plans to attack the United States or U.S. targets. He claimed that Reagan wanted to kill him. Gaddafi's speak was devoid of passion and even the celebrations appeared unusual. After two and a half years, therefore was no motive for revenge, like the attack to an U.S. airliner, as PanAm 103, over Lockerbie.<br />+++<br /><br />The president change in office, January 20, 1989 – January 20, 1993 President George H. W. Bush.<br /><br />Abdelbaset al Megrahi and Libya have nothing to do with the Lockerbie tragedy. Justice for both condemned ! <br /><br />by Edwin Bollier, MEBO Ltd. Telecommunication Switzerland. Webpage: www.lockerbie.ch<br />ebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.com