tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post1718399517990843721..comments2024-03-15T06:02:30.623+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: How UK Government hid secret Lockerbie reportRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-19710473197104260922017-06-01T08:37:33.919+01:002017-06-01T08:37:33.919+01:00The significance of the King of Jordan's lette...The significance of the King of Jordan's letter to Prime Minister John Major cannot be over-estimated. <br /><br />The Jordanian head of security was present in 1989 at at least two FBI interviews of the PFLP-GC expert bomb maker Marwan Khreesat. When purely hearsay extracts from FBI notes of those interviews were read out during the Lockerbie trial, the impression was given that Khreesat had not made the Lockerbie bomb - "Khreesat did not think that he had made the bomb used at Lockerbie...". <br /><br />And yet the King of Jordan writes a completely different story. He tells John Major that it was definitely the PFLP-GC bomb-maker Khreesat who made the Lockerbie bomb. It would seem that the head of Jordanian intelligence had, during the FBI interviews of Khreesat, heard a different version from that promulgated by the FBI. <br /><br />That is why the British and American governments went to such extraordinary lengths to prevent publication of the King's letter. And they are still doing it, with evasive statements such as "The court heard all the evidence, and they decided that Libya was responsible."<br /><br />But the court did not hear all the evidence. Only that which the British and American governments wanted the public and media to hear. About us ...https://www.blogger.com/profile/10861835905210461367noreply@blogger.com